Everything about Ambivalence totally explained
Ambivalence - a state of having
emotions of both positive and negative
valence or of having
thoughts or
actions in contradiction with each other, when they're related to the same object, idea or person (for example, feeling both
love and hatred for someone or something). The term is also commonly used to refer to situations where 'mixed feelings' of a more general sort are experienced or where a person experiences uncertainty or indecisiveness concerning something.
Ambivalence in psychoanalysis
In
psychoanalytic terminology, however, a more refined definition applies: the term (introduced into the discipline by
Bleuler in
1911), refers to an underlying emotional attitude in which the co-existing contradictory impulses (usually love and hate)
derive from a common source and are thus held to be
interdependent. Moreover, when the term is used in this psychoanalytic sense it wouldn't usually be expected that the person embodying this 'ambivalence' would actually
feel both of the two contradictory emotions as such: except in obsessional neurosis, which sees both sides being more or less 'balanced' in consciousness, one or other of the conflicting sides is usually
repressed. (Thus, for example, an
analysand's 'love' for his
father might be quite consciously experienced and openly expressed – while his 'hate' for the same
object might be heavily repressed and only indirectly expressed, and thus only revealed in analysis).
Another relevant distinction is that whereas the psychoanalytic notion of 'ambivalence' sees it as engendered by all
neurotic conflict, a person's everyday 'mixed feelings' may easily be based on a quite realistic assessment of the imperfect, inconsistent or self-contradictory nature of the thing being considered.
Intellectual ambivalence
Intellectual ambivalence refers to an inability or unwillingness to commit oneself to a definite answer, position, or conclusion in thought ("yes or no"), normally either because a definite stance is deliberately avoided or evaded for some personal motive, or because sufficient grounds (logical or experiential evidence) warranting a definite stance are lacking. To resolve intellectual ambivalence into a definite position is frequently a task for
criticism or
critique. The main problem with intellectual ambivalence is that it provides no clear guide or orientation for action and leadership. It is difficult to act or lead on the basis that something "might or might not be the case", that something "might or might not be a good idea" etc. In order to act or lead, definite ideas are necessary rather than uncertainty which incapacitates choices and decisions. Thus it often happens that someone in a leadership function pretends to be very "definite" about an issue, because the function
requires it, even though he or she's in truth ambivalent about the issue.
Further Information
Get more info on 'Ambivalence'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://ambivalence.totallyexplained.com">Ambivalence Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |
